Peer Review Policy

1. Commitment to Scholarly Rigor

Al-Rā'id is committed to publishing high-quality, original research that contributes significantly to its designated field. To ensure this, the journal employs a rigorous double-blind peer review process.

2. Reviewer Selection

Reviewers are chosen based on their expertise in the subject area of the submitted manuscript. They are scholars with a strong publication record and a demonstrated ability to provide constructive and insightful feedback. The editorial team maintains a database of qualified reviewers and actively seeks nominations from authors and the broader academic community.

3. Double-Blind Review Process

All submitted manuscripts undergo a double-blind review process. Author identities are anonymized before being sent to reviewers. Similarly, reviewer identities are kept confidential from authors. This ensures objectivity and minimizes potential bias in the evaluation process.

4. Review Criteria

Reviewers evaluate manuscripts based on the following criteria:

  • Originality: Does the manuscript present new and significant research findings?
  • Methodology: Is the research design sound and appropriate for the topic?
  • Analysis: Is the data analysis rigorous and convincing?
  • Interpretation: Are the research findings accurately interpreted and placed within the context of existing scholarship?
  • Clarity: Is the manuscript well-written, organized, and easy to understand?
  • Referencing: Are the references accurate and relevant?

5. Review Process Timeline

Authors can expect to receive initial feedback on their manuscript within [insert timeframe, e.g., 4-6 weeks] of submission. The final decision (accept, revise and resubmit, or reject) will typically be communicated within [insert timeframe, e.g., 8-12 weeks] of submission.

6. Communication with Authors

Authors will receive detailed feedback from the reviewers, outlining the strengths and weaknesses of their manuscript. This feedback is intended to be constructive and informative, guiding authors in revising their work for publication.

7. Confidentiality

Al-Rā'id maintains strict confidentiality regarding all submitted manuscripts and reviewer identities. Reviewers are expected to treat all submitted material with the utmost discretion.

8. Conflict of Interest

Reviewers are required to disclose any potential conflicts of interest before accepting a manuscript for review. This includes any personal, professional, or financial ties to the authors, their institutions, or the research subject matter.

9. Continuous Improvement

Al-Rā'id is committed to continuously improving its peer review process. We welcome feedback from authors and reviewers to ensure the fairness, efficiency, and effectiveness of our system.

10. Ethical Guidelines

All research published in Al-Rā'id must adhere to the highest ethical standards. Authors are expected to follow responsible research practices and report their findings with integrity.